Gjykates Europiane e te Drejtave te Njeriut
Kerkese :
E paraqitur ne baze te Konventes Europiane te te Drejtave te Njeriut, mbeshtetur ne nenet :
Neni 3 Ndalimi i Tortures ;
Neni 5 E drejta per liri dhe siguri
pika 4 dhe 5;
Neni 6 E drejta per nje proçes te rregullt;
Neni 13 E drejta per ankim efektiv;
Neni 41 Shperblimi i drejte.
Kerkues: Dashnor Luto Kozaj lindur ne Fier, me 02.09.1956, banues ne rrugen ‘‘Zoja Curre’’, pallati 533, Tirane. Me nr. Tel : (Numrat e telefonit jane hequr nga Redaksia e Alba – Dansk)
Objekti :
A. Shfuqizimin e vendimeve ;
nr.338, date 16.11.2004, te Gjykates se Rrethit Gjyqsor Korçë ;
nr. 109, date 11.10.2005, te Gjykates se Apelit Korçë ;
nr. 561, date 11.07.2007, te Dhomas se Keshillimit te Kolegjit Penal te Gjykates se Larte, Tirane ; nr. 85, date 13.06.2008 te Kolegji i Gjykates Kushtetuese te Republikes se Shqiperise.
B. Shperblim te drejte,
• Per periudhen qe kam qendruar pa pune (12.12.1997 – 29.07.1999) ;
• Per kohen qe kam qene i arrestuar ne kundershtim me ligjin (29.07.1999 – 29.12.2000) ;
• Per kohen qe kam qene me arrest ne shtepi (29.12.2000 – 11.10.2005) ;
• Shperblim per demin moral qe me eshte shkaktuar.
Bazuar ne nenin 41 te Konventes Europiane e te Drejtave te Njeriut.
Z. Gjyqtare:
Une kam mbaruar shkollen ne Universitetin e Tiranes ne Degen Ekonomist per Industrine.
Kam punuar si ekonomist ne Drejtorine e Kontroll – Revizionit ne Albpetrol, Patos, si anetare ne kete drejtori e me vone si Drejtor i Drejtoris te Kontroll – Revizionit ne Albpetrol deri ne 12.12.1997.
Gjate gjithe periudhes qe kam punuar, une kam qene i papajtueshem me cilindo qe shkelte ligjin.
Fakte kam shume, me poshte, po shkruaj disa:
Gjate periudhes 1992 deri 12.12.1997 une jam perballur me fenomene apo shkelje te ligjit ne menyre flagrante, siç ishin rastet:
1. Per ardhjen e ndihmave apo grandeve nga Komiteti Europian per Periudhen 1992 – 1993 per baze materiale e kimikate te ndryshme, etj.
a) Shkelje ligjore per ardhjen e ketyre ndihmave konsiston ne rritjen e çmimeve ne disa here ne krahasim me çmimin e tregut.
b) Shkelje tjeter ishte, se kjo vlere e ketyre mallrave me çmime te jashtezakoneshme tu derdhej Ministris te Energjitikes te Shqiperise ne forme te fondit Kundra – Parti.
2. Gjate periudhes 1992 – 1994 une kam konstatuar shkelje flagrante te rezolutes te O.K.B. ne lidhje me thyerjen e embargos ndaj Serbis per karburantet.
Keto fenomene une i kam kontrolluar ne pikat Doganore te Republikes se Shqiperise duke i verifikuar direkt, ku Drejtor i Pergjithshem i Doganave ka qene Z. Ridvan Bode sot, Minister i Financave te Shqiperise.
Si rezultat i denoncimit te ketyre fenomeneve une pushohem nga puna ne shtator
1993.
Per kete problem une hap konflikt gjyqsor me anen e nje Kerkes – Padi qe mban daten 14.05.1994 me objekt: rikthim ne pune.
(Lexo Kerkes – Padine date 14.05.1994)
Pas zhvillimit te proçeseve gjyqesore rikthehem ne pune me vendimin nr. 5130 date 23.12.1994 te Gjykates se Apelit Tirane.
(Lexo vendimin e sipercituar)
Ne vitin 1997 (qershor) ne Shqiperi behet rotacioni politik. Ne udheheqje te Shtetit vijne perfaqesuesit e Partise Socialiste, ku minister i Energjitikes ne Shqiperi, emerohet Ylli Bufi, i cili para Marsit te Vitit 1992 kishte qene Kryeminister i Shqiperise, qe kishte firmosur per terheqjen e ndihmave te Komunitetit Europian me çmime shume here me te larta se çmimet e tregut te asaj kohe.
Une duke qene konseguent me cilindo qe shkelte ligjin, konstatoj se Drejtori i Pergjithshem i Albpetrolit, Z. Gjergji Kerri, dhe mik i ngushte i ministrit te Energjitikes Z. Ylli Bufi, filloi te vidhte. Konkretisht konstatoj se Drejtori i Pergjithshem i Albpetrolit Z. Gjergji Kerri me daten 12.09.1997 nenshkruan dy kontrata fallco sikur i shiste kompanis ‘‘Vefa’’ Holding Tirane, me president Z. Vehbi Alimuçaj si me poshte:
1- Solar 500 ton x 97 $\ton = 48 500 $;
2 – Bitum 1500 ton x 100 $\ton = 150 000 $.
Keto kontrata ishin te fallsifikuara, kete e verteton ballafaqimi im me Presidentin e Kompanise ‘‘Vefa’’ Holding, Z. Vehbi Alimuçaj, i cili nuk i pranoi, nuk ishin te nenshkruara prej tij, dhe nuk kishte autorizuar njeri tjeter per kete lloj biznesi. (Lexo kontratat, me shenimet e Z. Vehbi Alimuçaj.)
Kjo eshte menyra apo forma qe perdoren pushtetaret e korruptuar qe erdhen ne udheheqje te Shtetit Shqiptar ne mesin e vitit 1997 per te vejedhur apo shkaterruar te gjitha pronat e kompanis ‘‘Vefa’’ Holding ne Shqiperi.
Me konstatimin e ketyre shkeljeve une njoftoj ne Ministrin e Energjitikes, Z. Ylli Bufi dhe Zv. Kryeministrin e asaj kohe Z. Kastriot Islamin.
Pergjigje e tyre per shkeljet ligjore qe kishte bere miku i tyre, Z. Gjergji Kerri ne detyren e Drejtorit te Pergjithshem te Albpetrolit, ishte pushimi nga puna per mua.
Une pushimin nga puna e kundershtoj duke hapur proçes gjyqsor.
Gjate proçeseve gjyqesore une argumentoj me fakte konkrete, shkeljet ligjore apo vjedhjet, qe ishin konstatuar ne Albpetrol, Shqiperi nga periudha 1992 deri ne fund te vitit 1997.
Keto shkelje ligjore i evidentoj dhe i argumentoj me fakte konkrete edhe ne kerkesen qe une kam bere ne Gjykaten e Larte Tirane me 06.11.1998 me numer 662 te aktit e regjistruar ne Regjistrit Themeltar te Gjykates Larte, Tirane.
Une kam denoncuar Z. Gjergji Kerrin, Drejtor i Pergjithshem i Albpetrolit, si vjedhes te pasuris te Albpetrolit si dhe kam akuzuar si mbeshtetes te Gjergji Kerrit dhe Ministrin e Energjitikes, Ylli Bufin dhe Zv.Kryeministrin e asaj kohe, Kastriot Islamin si mbrojtes dhe mbeshtetes te hajdutit Gjergji Kerri, qe ishte ne detyren shume te rendesishme, si Drejtor i Albpetrolit.
(Lexo Rekursin drejtuar Gjykates se Larte).
Une nga fundi i vitit 1998 deri ne Maj 1999 te gjitha shkeljet ligjore qe kisha konstatuar ne Albpetrol i bera publike ne shtypin e perditshem ne Shqiperi.
(Lexo gazetat.)
Gjate kesaj periudhe gjyqi ne Gjykaten e Larte nuk po zhvillohej.
Une kerkoja ne gjyq qe te paraqiteshin:
o Ylli Bufi si Minister i Energjitikes;
o Kastriot Islamin si Zv. Kryeminister;
Qe keta te argumentonin apo deklaronin se per materialet shkresore apo faktet ligjore, kishin dieni edhe ata, me qellim qe une te fitoja te drejten qe te rikthehesha ne vendin e punes si Drejtor i Drejtoris te Kontroll – Revizionit, ne Albpetrol.
Pa u zhvilluar gjyqi ne Gjykaten e Larte une arrestohem ne kundershtim me çdo ligj apo fakt me daten 29.07.1999 ne shtepine time ne Patos, te rrethit Fier, Shqiperi, nen akuzen se kisha bashkepunuar me hajdutet e prones te Albpetrolit ne qytetin e Korçes, 250 km larg nga vendi i punes, ku une punoja. Gjyqi per rikthimin ne pune u zhvillua ne daten 07.10.1999 d.m.th. pas tre muaj qe une isha i paraburgosur ne birucat e komisariatit te Korçes. Kolegji Administrativ me Vendimin nr. 1047 date 07.10.1999 dhe nr. 662 te aktit, ne Gjykaten e Larte merr vendim qe te mos rikthehem ne punen e meparshme.
Vjedhjet ne Degen e Shperndarjes te Karburantit ne Korçe, kam qene une personi qe i kam verifikuar, konstatuar dhe denoncuar duke i pushuar nga puna dhe kam dhene propozim per ndjekje penale.
Une nga momenti i konstatimit deri te dhenia e mases per pushim nga puna, te vjedhesve te Deges se Shperndarjes te Karburantit ne Korçe nuk kane kaluar as 24 ore.
Kam qene une, denoncuesi fillestar i ketyre vjedhjeve. Ne Korçe une kam shkuar i shoqeruar me kolege te tjere per te ushtruar kontroll ne baze te ankesave qe kishin bere punonjesit e Deges se Karburanteve ne Bilisht,qe kishin vartesi administrative nga Dega e Shperndarjes se Karburanteve te Korçes. Keto ankime jane te shoqeruara me urdhera nga Drejtorat e Pergjithshem te Albpetrolit, qe kane qene ne ate periudhe, Afrim Jupi dhe Gjergji Kerri te cilet me kane dhene detyre me shkrim per Drejtorin e Kontroll-Revizionit te shkonte e te verifikonte direkt problemet qe trajtonin punetoret e Bilishtit.
(Lexo ankesat dhe urdherat me shkrim.)
Duke mos u zgjatur shume une theksoj se shteti Shqiptar: Qeveritaret e korruptuar, Prokuroret e korruptuar si dhe te gjithe Gjyqtaret qe kane marre pjese ne gjykimin e kesaj çeshtje kane bashkepunuar me qellim qe te mos dalin ne shesh vjedhjet dhe korrupsioni gjigand qe zhvillohej ne Albpetrol.
Duke me cilesuar mua si bashkepunetor me vjedhjesit, Gjykatat Shqiptare (gjyqtoret qe kane marre pjese ne çeshtjen time) ne bashkepunim me personat te veshur me pushtet politik dhe shteteror, bene te mundur qe vjedhjet qe une kam denoncuar ne Gjykaten e Larte me nr. 662 te aktit viti 1999 ti mbyllnin ose tu vinin kapak.
Me poshte po shprehem se si jane zhvilluar proçeset ne kundershtim te hapur me ligjin dhe me Konventen Europiane te te Drejtave te Njeriut.
Vlen te nenvizoj se pergjegjesi te madhe ka Gjykata e Larte, Tirane, sepse ne vendimin nr. 187 date 07.03.2002, ka caktuar shume detyra per Gjykaten e rrethit gjyqesor Korçe, e cila gjate proçesit te rigjykimit nuk i zbatoj ato dhe Gjykata e Larte, heshti ne perfundim te gjykimit te kesaj çeshtje.
Gjate proçesit te rigjykimit mua me semuret vajza e vogel e cila u diagnostikua me diagnozen Talasso – Drepanocitosa (anemi mesdhetare). Kam 6 vjet qe e kuroj ne Itali, ku jam ne pritje per trapiantin e palces.
Komisioni mjeko – ligjor ne Itali e ka cilesuar femijen tim si invalide civile ne pritje per trapiantin e palces.
(Lexo raportet mjeksore.)
Pra vendimi i Gjykates se Larte nr. 561 date 11.07.2007 eshte antiligjor, sepse nuk ka verifikuar detyrat e lena nga vete kjo gjykate per Gjykaten Vartese.
Z. Gjyqtare:
Une si subjekt i nje procesi gjyqesor, per shkak te gjykimit te padrejte, legjitimohem ne kerkesen per shfuqizimin si anti Konventes Europiane te te Drejtave te Njeriut te vendimeve te Gjykatave si me poshte:
I. Vendimi i Gjykates se Rrethit, Korçe, nr. 185 dt: 14.07.2000
II. Vendimi i Gjykates se Apelit, Korçe, nr 102 dt: 15.06.2001
III. Vendimi i Gykates se Larte, Tirane, nr. 187 dt: 07.03.2002
IV. Vendimi i Gjykates se Rrethit, Korçe, nr. 338 dt: 16.11.2004
V. Vendimi i Gykates se Apelit, Korçe, nr. 109 dt: 11.10.2005
VI. Vendimi i Gjykates se Larte, Tirane, nr. 561 dt: 11.07.2007
VII. Vendimi i Gjykates Kushtetuese, Tirane, nr. 85 dt: 13.06.2008
te dhena kundra meje, prandaj meqenese çeshtja eshte ne kompetencen e Gjykates Europiane te te Drejtave te Njeriut, ju drejtohem per sa vijon:
1. PROCESI I HETIMIT PARAPRAK
Me 01.07.1999 gjykata e Korçes ka vendosur masen e sigurimit per Dashnor Kozaj arrest ne burg, per vepren penale te vjedhjes se pasurise duke shperdoruar detyren.
Ne zbatim te ketij vendimi jam arrestuar ne Fier, me 29.07.1999, dhe jam derguar ne dhomat e izolimit te policise Korçe, me 30.07.1999, ku jam hetuar ne gjendje arresti.
Policia gjyqesore mbas perfundimit te hetimit, me 25.10.1999, me ka njohur me aktet perkatese te dosjes hetimore.
Une, siç del nga proçesverbali i rastit, kam kerkuar te me vihen ne dispozicion kopja e akteve te marra gjate hetimit paraprak, si dhe kam pretenduar qe veprimtarine time, e kam kryer ne baze te ligjeve, duke deklaruar qe per kete, disponoj dokumentet e nevojshme, te cilat provonin se vjedhjet ne Albpetrol dhe autoret e tyre, kam qene une,ai qe i kam zbuluar dhe denoncuar, perfshire edhe Drejtorin e Pergjithshem te Albpetrolit dhe funksionare te tjere te larte shtetore.
Kerkesat dhe pretendimet e mesiperme, te mjaftueshme per te provuar pafajsine, nuk jane pranuar per t’u sqaruar nga akuza dhe per t’i dhene kopjet e shkresave ne sherbim te akteve hetimore.
Prokurori i ngarkuar me ndjekjen e hetimit dhe oficeri i policise gjyqesore, ne kundershtim me nenin 327.1 te K.P.P., nuk kane pergatitur relacionin shpjegues, te detyrueshem, per faktet dhe provat, me sugjerimet e veta per menyren e perfundimit te hetimeve, per t’ia dhene prokurorit te rrethit per shqyrtim.
Prokurori (titullari) i Prokurorise, ne mungese te relacionit, ka vendosur dergimin e ceshtjes ne gjykate. Pas kesaj eshte hartuar kerkesa per gjykimin e ceshtjes dhe dosja i eshte nisur gjykates per kompetence. Ne kundershtim me nenin 331.1 te K.P.P., ajo eshte nenshkruar nga vartesi i titullarit, Prokurori Edmond Shytko, i ngarkuar me hetimin, dhe jo nga Prokurori i rrethit gjyqesor, Vangjel Tanellari si titullar i Prokurorise. Kerkesa per gjykimin e çeshtjes, gjithashtu, ne kundershtim me nenin 331.3 te K.P.P., nuk i eshte njoftuar kerkuesit, Dashnor Kozaj, kundrejt nenshkrimit e tij.
Keto shkelje, mungesa e firmes se Prokurorit te rrethit ne kerkesen per gjykim dhe e dijenise se Dashnor Kozaj, kundrejt nenshkrimit te tij si i pandehur, e bejne ate si akt procedurial, te pavlefshem, bashke me pasojat juridike te rrjedhura prej saj. Pra gjykimet dhe vendimet e gjykatave qe kane shqyrtuar kete çeshtje jane te pavlefshme. Ne kete veshtrim, gjykata ka gjykuar dhe vendosur per nje çeshtje penale pa pasur kerkese nga Prokuroria. Eshte e njohur per te gjithe, se Prokuroria e cilit do nivel ne marredhenie me te tretet perfaqesohet nga titullari dhe jo nga vartesit e tij, te cilet nuk legjitimohen ne keto raste te firmosin kerkesen per gjykimin e çeshtjes dhe t’ia dergojne ate gjykates.
E drejta dhe kompetenca ekskluzive e Prokurorit per te firmosur kerkesen per gjykimin e çeshtjes dhe jo e vartesit e tij, eshte nje problem parimor dhe ligjor, perndryshe gjykata nuk legjitimohet te gjykoje nje çeshtje penale pa kerkesen e titullarit te prokurorise.
Policia, gjate kohes ne dhomat e izolimit,me ka rrahur dhe keqtrajtuar. Mua nuk me eshte siguruar trajtim njerezor, por i jam nenshtruar tortures dhe poshterimit. Per keto arsye me 17.02.2000 jam shtruar ne spitalin e Korçes me diagnoze ‘‘Contuzio Corporis’’. Per arsye te goditjeve te shkaktuara me mjete dhe sende te forta ne koke, fytyre dhe trup, duke marre mjekimet e nevojshme. Ky fakt pasqyrohet ne vertetimin me shkrim, date 13.03.2001, te leshuar nga spitali i Korçes. Fatkeqesisht personeli mjekesor, ne kundershtim me nenin 282 te K.P.P., edhe pse i detyruar, nuk e ka kallezuar rastin ne policine gjyqesore.
Une kam kallezuar ne Prokurori, kam protestuar per kete keqtrajtim edhe para gjykates, por kam ndeshur ne murin e heshtjes. Ne baze te nenit 5.2 te K.P.P., 25 te Kushtetutes dhe 3 te Konventes Evropiane, keto shkelje jane nga me te rendat dhe te denueshme sepse kufizojne dhe cenojne lirite e personit.
(Lexo Epikrizen e mjekut dhe vertetimin e spitalit te Korçes.)
2. PROCESI I HETIMIT TE çESHTJES
Duke qene se kerkesa per gjykimin e çeshtjes nuk ishte firmosur nga Prokurori, por nga vartesi i tij, gjykata nuk mund dhe nuk duhej te investohej ne gjykimin e çeshtjes, aq me teper kur kerkesa nuk ishte firmosur as nga kerkuesi Dashnor Kozaj dhe ajo nuk me ishte njoftuar. Ne keto rrethana dhe per kete shkak, nga ana e gjykates dosja duhej te kthehej administrativisht dhe çeshtja te mos gjykohej prej saj.
Me vendimin 185, date 14.07.2000, gjykata ka deklaruar fajtor, kerkuesin Dashnor Kozaj dhe me ka denuar per vjedhje te pasurise ne bashkpunim duke shperdoruar detyren, ne baze te nenit 135 e 25 te K.P..
Kunder ketij vendimi kerkuesi Dashnor Kozaj ka paraqitur kerkese ankimore duke parashtruar:
• Vendimi eshte dhene ne mohim te te drejtave per t’u mbrojtur ne proçes penal;
• Eshte mohuar a drejta e fjales ne gjykim ;
• Eshte mohuar e drejta e mbrojtjes per te paraqitur prova shkresore dhe te lira me deshimtare dhe gjykata nuk u ka dhene pergjigje pretendimeve me vendimin e saj.
Me vendimin 201, date 15.06.2001, Gjykata e Apelit ka vendosur lenien ne fuqi te vendimit te gjykates se shkalles se pare. Mirepo ne vendim, Gjykata e Apelit nuk i ka analizuar dhe nuk u ka dhene pergjigje pretendimeve te mesiperme, te parashtruara kunder vendimit te Gjykates te Rrethit.
Kunder vendimeve te te dy gjykatave une, kerkuesi Dashnor Kozaj kam paraqitur rekurs, duke parashtruar se :
• Ne asnje seance gjyqesore gjykata nuk me ka lene te flase dhe te shpjegoje rrethanat e ngjarjes ;
• Nga gjykatat jane shkelur nenet 356, 357, 358 dhe 359 te K.P.P., qe do ta thote se mua me eshte mohuar e drejta te parashtoje faktet, objekt akuze, dhe te tregoja provat qe kerkoja te shqyrtoheshin ;
• Gjykata nuk ka dhene vendim per marrjen e provave dhe nuk ka lejuar berjen e pretendimeve per marrjen e tyre ;
• Gjykata nuk me ka bere te ditur mua, se kam te drejte te beje pretendime lidhur me marrjen e provave gjate shqyrtimit gjyqesor.
Me vendimin nr. 187, date 07.03.2002, Gjykata e Larte ka vendosur prishjen e vendimeve te te dy gjykatave dhe e ka derguar çeshtjen per rishqyrtim ne Gjykaten e Shkalles se Pare te Korçes. Si shkak per prishjen e vendimeve ka pranuar se :
• Gjykatat pa asnje argument e analize provash kane pranuar se kerkuesi Dashnor Kozaj, bashke me personat e tjere S. Starova, S. Shano e L. Duka, ka vjedhur me ane shperdorimit te detyres 8.238.840 leke;
• Konkluzionet e vendimeve te gjykatave jane ta pabazuara ne prova dhe kontradiktore, te cilat i bejne vendimet alogjike ;
• Nuk eshte provuar marreveshja ne krim, roli i bashkepunetoreve, si dhe vlera e vjedhur ;
• Gjykata e Apelit ka pranuar arsyetimin qe ka bere gjykata e faktit ne vendimin e saj, por nuk i ka dhene pergjigje pretendimeve te mia se kam qene une, ai qe kam denoncuar te pandehurit e tjere;
• Gjykata provat nuk ia ka nenshtruar diskutimit te paleve.
3. PROCESI I RIGJYKIMIT TE çESHTJES
Me vendimin nr, 338, date 16.11.2004, gjykata e rigjykimit ka vendosur perseri denimin e Dashnor Kozaj. Ajo ne dhenien e vendimit eshte mbeshtetur ne po ato argumente qe ishte bazuar me pare gjykata e faktit dhe nuk ka marre parasysh pretendimet e kerkuesit Dashnor Kozaj dhe ne kundershtim me nenin 440, ne lidhje edhe me nenin 447.2 te K.P.P., nuk ka zbatuar detyrat dhe konkluzionet e Gjykates se Larte. Gjykata e Faktit, gjate rishqyrtimit te çeshtjes, nuk i eshte permbajtur vendimit te kesaj gjykate, persa i perket sqarimi se ku qendronte marreveshja ne krim dhe cili ka qene roli i secilit bashkepunetor, nuk ka pranuar kerkesen per te administruar dhe per t’ia nenshtruar debatit gjyqesor provat e kerkuesit, Dashnor Kozaj, te cilat vertetonin pafajsine e tij, i cili ne seancen e dates 2.5.2003 ka paraqitur kerkesen e perseritur per te dorezuar nje kopje te te gjitha dokumentave te tija.
Keto shkelje, hetimi i njeanshem i çeshtjes, moszbatimi i detyrave, duke mos iu permbajtur vendimit te Gjykates se Larte ne rigjykim, mospranimi i provave te paraqitura nga kerkuesi Dashnor Kozaj, jane te renda dhe bejne proçesin te padrejte dhe me pasoja negative per mua..
Ne rigjykim une perseri kam kerkuar te paraqese provat ne favorin tim, si me deshmitare ashtu dhe me shkrese, por pa rezultat. Jo vetem kaq, por gjykata nuk me ka lejuar t’u beje pyetje deshmitareve dhe te akuzuarve, si dhe te bente ballafaqimin e thenieve midis meje dhe atyre. Sikurse del edhe nga proçesverbali gjyqesor, gjykata i ka ndaluar te akuzuarit si dhe deshmitaret t’u jepnin pergjigje pyetjeve te kerkuesit Dashnor Kozaj.
Une kam kerkuar te pyeten si deshmitaret Feçor Hoxha edhe Afrim Jupi, te cilet kane qene persona me detyra drejtuese ne Albpetrol. Ata kishin dijeni per kontrollet e kryera nga une ne Degen e Shitjes se Karburantit ne Korçe, qe kisha nxjerre pergjegjesine e personave fajtore, si dhe pata bere propozimet perkatese per masat administrative, civile dhe penale qe duheshin marre per shkeljet e kryera nga te pandehurit e tjere, por gjykata nuk i ka pyetur keta deshmitare, me te cilet une doja te provoja se nuk isha i perzier ne krim.
Tipik eshte rasti me Feçor Hoxhen, i cili ka kerkuar gjykates me shkrim me daten 16.05.2003 per ta pyetur. Ai eshte paraqitur ne gjykate, me 16.05.2003, dhe ka kerkuar te deshmoje rreth çeshtjes, si ish shef i shitjes se karburanteve ne Kombinatin e Perpunimit te Thelle te Naftes ne Ballsh. Gjykata nuk ka pranuar ta therrase dhe ta pyese si deshmitar, por ai deshmine qe do te bente para gjykates, e ka paraqitur me shkrim dhe dorezuar ne sekretari me 16.05.2003. Sipas deklarimeve te shkruara, kontrollet dhe konstatimet e shkeljeve ne Degen e Shitjes se Karburantit ne Korçe ,Dashnor Kozaj i ka bere duke qene edhe ky i pranishem. Ne kete deklarate ai pohon se theniet e shkruara ne te jene te verteta, ndersa akuzat kunder Dashnor Kozaj, nuk qendronin.
Kjo kerkese eshte zhdukur nga dosja gjyqesore dhe nuk eshte administruar nga trupi gjykues. (Lexo Vertetimin e Gjykates se Rrethit Gjyqesor Korçe date 14.11.2008).
Po keshtu une, kam vazhduar te kerkoja qe te paraqese para gjykates prova shkresore, sikurse jane informacioni, date 15.08.1997, i hartuar bashke me revizorin Genc Koliçi, ne te cilin pasqyroheshin shkeljet dhe abuzimet e kryera nga Sabaudin Starova dhe vartesit e tij, perfshire edhe terheqjen nga Banka e Kursimeve Korçe, me anen e nje urdher xhirimi te dates 17.06.1997, te shumes 6 milione leke, per ndertimin e viles qe kishte blere ne vitin 1997, ne Pogradec, ne te cilin nuk specifikohen arsyeja perse terhiqeshin dhe per çfare do te sherbenin keto leke; raporti ‘‘Mbi veprimtarine e kontroll-revizionit te Albpetrolit per periudhat 1992 – 1996 dhe shkurt 1997 – tetor 1997’’, date 18.10.1997, si dhe informacionin ‘‘Mbi analizen e materialit te Deges se Karburantit Korçe’’, date 23.09.1997, i firmosur nga Drejtori i Filialit te Shitjes se Karburantit te Albpetrolit Fier, Bashkim Habili.
Ne keto dokumente shkresore, te cilat une kerkoja te administroheshin nga gjykata, pasqyrohen shkeljet e bera nga te pandehurit e tjere te konstatuara nga kontrolli i zhvilluar prej meje dhe masat per zhdetimin, arketimin dhe propozimi per ndjekje penale kunder personave pergjegjes ne Drejtorine e Shitjes se Karburanteve Korçe.
Mospranimi i kerkeses per pyetjen e deshmitareve te kerkuar, per marrjen e provave shkresore dhe administrimit te tyre gjate gjykimit vjen ne kundershtim me nenet 151 dhe 152 te K.P.P. si dhe me vendimin nr. 187, date 07.03.2003 te Gjykates se Larte, i cili orientonte qe te sqarohej pretendimi i Dashnor Kozaj, se ’’Ai ka zbuluar vjedhjen dhe ka denoncuar te pandehurit Sabaudin Starova dhe Lirika Duka’’. Ne kete menyre gjykata ka cenuar te drejten e Dashnor Kozaj, per t’u mbrojtur nga nje akuze e bere pikerisht nga ata persona te cilet i kishte denoncuar me pare. Ne kuptim te nenit 31.d te Kushtetutes, i cili garanton te drejten e cilit do t’u beje pyetje dhe te kerkoje paraqitjen e deshmitareve, te cilet mund te sqarojne faktet, kjo eshte shkelje e proçesit te rregullt gjyqesor.
Gjykata e rigjykimit seancat e fundit gjyqesore i ka zhvilluar pa pranine time. Une nuk jam paraqitur per shkak se kam qene i detyruar te qendroje prane vajzes te mitur, te shtruar me urgjence per kurim ne spital ne Itali nga nje semundje e rrezikshme per jeten, e cila nuk mund te mjekohej ne Shqiperi. Ne letrat e dates 25 mars dhe 26 gusht 2004, bashke me dokumentet spitalore, i kam kerkuar gjykates qe te shtynte seancat gjyqesore deri ne permiresimin minimal te shendetit te vajzes, pasi do te shkoja urgjent per te vazhduar proçesin gjyqesor. Ndonese kjo rrethane ka qene nje pengese e arsyeshme, e cila e perjashtonte nge pergjegjesia per mosparaqitjen ne seance gjyqesore, gjykata, ne kundershtim me nenin 350.1 te K.P.P. i cili e obligonte qe te pezullonte shqyrtimin gjyqesor te çeshtjes, ka vendosur deklarimin e mungeses dhe vazhdimin e gjykimit duke caktuar kryesisht nje mbrojtes, roli i te cilit dhe mbrojtja qe ka realizuar nuk ka qene efektive, por tejet formale dhe aspak profesionale, sepse ka qendruar krejtesisht inaktiv gjate gjykimit. Para se te perfundonte hetimi gjyqesor nuk i ka kerkuar gjykates qe te zbatoheshin detyrat e vena ne vendimin e Gjykates se Larte dhe te pranoheshin kerkesat e perseritura nga kerkuesi Dashnor Kozaj, per te pyetur deshmitaret e tij si dhe per paraqitjen e provave shkresore, i cili konkretisht ne seancen e dates 02.05.2003 te rigjykimit, per te disajten here, i kam kerkuar gjykates qe te dorezoja nje kopje te te gjitha dokumentave qe dispononte kerkuesi, Dashnor Kozaj ndersa diskutimin perfundimtar e ka filluar dhe mbaruar me nje fjale te vetme ’’kerkoj pafajsi’’, pa formuluar dhe parashtruar para gjykates pretendimet dhe konkluzionet perkatese. Ne kete menyre mbrojtesi nuk ka ndihmuar qe Dashnor Kozaj, t’i garantoheshin te drejtat procedurale dhe t’i ruheshin interesat e tij ligjore, detyrim ky qe buron nga neni 6.2 i Kodit te Procedures Penale.
Vendimi i dhene nga gjykata e rigjykimit ne mungese te personit tim dhe duke qene se une nuk kam patur dijeni per kete vendim ne kohen e duhur, nuk kam patur mundesi te ushtroje te drejten e ankimit. Per kete shkak eshte cenuar e drejta kushtetuese e ankimit ne nje gjykate me te larte, e parashikuar nga neni 43 i Kushtetutes.
Me vendimin nr. 109, date 11.10.2005, Gjykata e Apelit ka vendosur ndryshimin e vendimit te Gjykates se faktit. Gjykata ka bera ndryshimin e cilesimit juridik te vepres ne ngarkim te Dashnor Kozaj, nga vjedhje ne bashkepunim duke shperdoruar detyren, te parashikuar nga neni 135 e 25 i K.P., ne bashkepunim, ne baze te nenit 248 e 25 te Kodit Penal.
Sipas vendimit te Gjykates se Apelit, fajsia ne shperdorim te detyres nuk qendron ne faktin se Dashnor Kozaj, nuk ka pase per qellim per te vjedhur, por ne faktin se nuk ka zbatuar detyrat kontrolluese. Ne kundershtim me kete konkluzion te gjykates, faktet dhe provat kane treguar te kunderten, se kam qene pikerisht une qe nepermjet kontrollit, kam zbuluar dhe denoncuar veprimet e paligjshme te te pandehurve te tjere.
Gjykata e Apelit, ndryshimin e cilesimit juridik te vepres penale e ka bere mbas shqyrtimit gjyqesor, ne kohen qe ishte terhequr per marrjen e vendimit. Ky veprim procedurial, ndryshimi kryesisht nga gjykata i cilesimit juridik te vepres, ka cenuar proçesin e rregullt ligjor, sepse ajo para se ta bente kete ndryshim, e kishte per detyre te vinte palet ne dijeni dhe per kete shkak domosdo duhej te riçelte seancen gjyqesore, per t’iu dhene atyre mundesine per te bere pretendime dhe per t’u pregatitur lidhur me kete ndryshim. Edhe jurisprudenca e Gjykates Kushtetuese ka pranuar te drejten qe ka gjykata te ndryshoje akuzen, por me kusht qe per kete me pare te vihen ne dijeni palet dhe te degjoje pretendimet e tyre, perndryshe, ne te kundert, proçesi gjyqesor eshte i parregullt. (shih: Vendimet e Gj.K. (1998 – 1999), f. 284).
Kunder te dy vendimeve kerkuesi Dashnor Kozaj ka paraqitur rekurs ne Gjykaten e Larte. Meqenese Gjykata e Apelit nuk e kishte arsyetuar me kohe vendimin, avokati qe ka hartuar rekursin nuk i ka treguar ne menyre te hollesishme shkaqet, shkeliet e ligjit, faktet dhe provet perse kundeshtohej vendimi, por i ka trajtuar perciptaz. Megjithese ne rekurs eshte shprehur se keto do t’i parashtronte pasi te merrej i arsyetuar vendimi i Gjykates se Apelit, ne te vertete nuk e ka plotesuar rekursin.
Ne kete rast pergjegjesia bie mbi avokatin dhe jo mbi mua, per arsye se mbrojtja, njelloj si ne rigjykimin e shkalles se pare, ka qene formale dhe jo efektive e profesionale. Ne kuptim te nenit 31 te Kushtetutes eshte cenuar mbrojtja e interesave ligjore dhe kushtetuese te Dashnor Kozaj.
I pandehuri Sotiraq Shamo ne ankimin që ka bërë pranë Gjykatës së Lartë Tiranë, për shfuqizimin e vendimeve nr..185 dt..14.07.2000 të Gjykatës së Faktit, Korçë dhe nr 102 dt.15.06.2001 te Gjykatës së Apelit Korçë, ka deklaruar se:
• Kam qënë i kërcënuar për të zhdukur fizikisht si dhe për të më rëmbyer fëmijët, që të mos tregonte të vërtetën e ngjarjeve që kanë ndodhur në Degën e shpërndrjes së karburanteve në Korccë gjat vitit 1997.
• Sotiraq Shamo ka qënë i detyrur me forcë për të bërë ankim fallco kundër Dashnor Kozaj.
• (Lexo ankimin, rekursin e Sotiraq Shamo me dt. 25.06.2001, për Gjykatën e Lartë Tiranë)
Unë, kërkuesi Dashnor Kozaj kamë kërkuar në shumë seanca të rigjykimit të çështjes, që të pyetet i pandehuri Sotiraq Shamo, të bëhej ballafaqimi me mua në seancat gjygjësore, por Gjykata e Rigjykimit nuk pranoj asnjëherë, duke marr vendim se kërkesa ime nuk pranohej, duke e quajtur si jo ligjore.
Unë kërkesën time e bazoja në K.P.P. neni 167/1.
(Lexo proçes verbalin e rigjykimit, faqe 36 të datës 20.03.2003)
• Skandal tjeter ne vendimin nr. 109 dt: 11-10-2005 i Gjykates se Apelit, Korçe eshte se, per te pandehurin Sotiraq Shamo kjo gjykate e denon me kohen e paraburgimit, por ne te vertete ky njeri nuk ka bere asnje ore arrest ne paraburgim.
• Edhe kete fakt skandaloz te Gjykates se Apelit, Korçe, as Gjykata e Larte dhe as Gjykata Kushtetuese e Shqiperise, nuk e kane evidentuar, per te prishur vendimet e gjykatave vartese ne Korçe, si te pa mbeshtetura ne ligj apo ne prova ta pakundershtueshme.
Dhoma e Keshillimit te Kolegjit Penal e Gjykates se Larte, me vendimin nr.561, date 11.07.2007, ka vendosur mospranimi e rekursit, ndonese sikurse u trajtuan, problemet juridike ishin te shumta, te atij karakteri dhe natyre qe formonin shkelje te cilat çonin patjeter ne prishjen e vendimit.
4. PARAQITJA E SHKAQEVE LIGJORE DHE KUSHTETUESE
Garancite e parashikuar nga legjislacioni procedural, Kushtetuta dhe Konventa Evropiane nuk jane respektuar ne proçesin gjyqesor, por gjithashtu as ne fazen qe e ka paraprire hetimi paraprak.
1- Eshte shkelur e drejta per t’u vene ne dijeni me kerkesen per gjykimin e çeshtjes dhe permbajtjen e saj, neni 331, K.P.P.
Kerkesa ekzistuese per gjykimin e çeshtjes, qe ka shoqeruar dosjen hetimore, nuk ka parashtruar me hollesi burimet e provave dhe faktet qe ato u referohen dhe sikurse parashtruam me lart, ajo nuk eshte nenshkruar dhe vulosur nga Prokurori dhe une, Dashnor Kozaj, nuk jam vene ne dijeni te saj kundrejt firmes. Si rrjedhojne dosja duhej te kthehej administrativisht nga gjykata pasi ne keto kushte nuk mund te investohej per shqyrtimin e saj. Per kete arsye gjykimet e zhvilluara jane te pavlefshme sepse mungon kerkesa e ligjshme per gjykimin e çeshtjes.
2- Eshte shkelur e drejta per te paraqitur prova shkresore dhe me deshmitare dhe per t’i administruar gjykata, neni 31.d i Kushtetutes dhe 6.1 dhe 3.d te Konventes.
Gjykata kishte per detyre qe, njelloj si provat ne baze te te cilave ishte akuzuar Dashnor Kozaj, te merrte dhe analizonte edhe provet e paraqitura nga une, me te cilat kerkoja vertetimin e pafajsise ne lidhje me akuzen kunder meje.
Kjo e drejte kushtetuese nuk eshte zbatuar ne favor te kerkuesit, Dashnor Kozaj. Pikerisht per kete Gjykata e Larte heren e pare i ka prishur te dy vendimet e gjykatave me te ulta duke arsyetuar qe ne rishqyrtimin e çeshtjes duhet sqaruar ekzistenca e marreveshjes dhe vertetimi i anes subjektive te çdo personi ne kryerjen e vepres. Ajo me te drejte u ka bere verejtje gjykatave me te ulta se nuk jane respektuar kerkesat procedurale (neni 151.152) qe lidhen me marrjen dhe çmuarjen e proveve, me mosdhenien pergjigje problemeve e pretendimeve te ngritura gjate gjykimit te çeshtjes nga ana e Dashnor Kozaj, se kam qene une personi zyrtar qe i kam zbuluar vjedhjet dhe kam bere denoncimin e tyre.
Ne rigjykimin e çeshtjes, gjykatat kane bere te njejtat shkelje procedurale. Mua me eshte mohuar e drejta e paraqitjes se provave te lira shkresore dhe me deshmitare, te cilat provonin pafajsine time, gje te cilen e kam parashtruar me insistim para seciles gjykate. Kjo shkelje e ben proçesin gjyqesor te parregullt.
3- Eshte shkelur parimi i barazise se mjeteve, neni 6.3 i Konventes Evropiane.
E drejta per nje gjykim te rregullt perfshin edhe parimin e barazise se mjeteve. Ne rastin e Dashnor Kozaj, ky parim eshte shkelur, sepse nuk me eshte dhene mundesia e barabarte me palen akuzuese qe te paraqese çeshtjen time. Ne gjykim akuza ka pasur avantazhe ne raport me mua, kerkuesin, Dashnor Kozaj, sepse me eshte mohuar mundesia te paraqese provat e mia, me deshmitare, si Feçor Hoxha dhe Afrim Jupi, si dhe provat shkresore, si informacionet date 15.08.1997, data 02-09-1997, aktkontrollonin date18-10-1997 dhe proçesverbalin date 13.08.1997,e te tjera shkresa qe i bashkangjiten kesaj kerkese, te cilat rrezojne akuzen dhe provojne pafajsine time..
4- Eshte shkelur e drejta per t’u vene ne dijeni per akuzen e re, neni 6.3.a i Konventes.
Gjykata e Apelit ka ricilesuar vepren penale mbas mbylljes se shqyrtimit gjyqesor dhe eshte terhequr per vendim. Riklasifikimin e nje vepre penale pas mbylljes se seances gjyqesore, kur gjykata kete e ben kryesisht, duhet t’ua vere ne dijeni me pare paleve, per t’u dhene mundesi te parashtrojne pretendimet e tyre dhe per te organizuar personi, mbrojtjen nga akuza e re. Pavaresisht se faktet materiale te parashtruara nga Prokurori kunder Dashnor Kozaj, ishin te ditura, gjykata e kishte per detyre t’i vinte ne dijeni palet, por sidomos mua, qe t’me jepte mundesine te shprehja pretendimet dhe te paraqisja edhe provet e shumta qe administroje edhe sot qe po beje kete kerkese.. Edhe per kete shkak proçesi gjyqesor eshte i padrejte.
5- Eshte shkelur e drejta per te qene i pranishem ne proçesin gjyqesore te rigjykimit dhe e degjimit, neni 31.3 i Kushtetutes, 6.1 dhe 6.3.c te Konventes.
Gjykata e rigjykimit, seancat e fundit gjyqesore i ka zhvilluar pa qene une i pranishem. Une nuk kisha hequr dore nga e drejta per te qene i pranishem ne seancat degjimore. Mungesa ne gjykim ka ardhur per shkaqe te arsyeshme te cilat me perjashtojne nga pergjegjesia per mospranine time ne gjykim. Per pamundesine e marrjes pjese ne seancat gjyqesore une kam vene ne dijeni me shkrim gjykaten dhe kam kerkuar shtyrjen e tyre. Pavaresisht nga kjo, gjykata ne vend qe te pezullonte shqyrtimin gjyqesor ka deklaruar mungesen time. Ka zhvilluar gjyqin pa pranine time duke me mohuar padrejtesisht te drejten per t’u degjuar dhe per t’u mbrojtur.
6- Eshte cenuar e drejta per nje ndihme ligjore efektive dhe professionale, minimalisht e duhur, neni 31.ç i Kushtetutes dhe 6(3)c i Konventes.
Une duke mos qene ne dijeni te zhvillimit te seancave gjyqesore dhe te vendimit te denimit, nuk kam mundur ushtroje ankim kunder vendimit te gjykates se rigjykimit.
Mbrojtja e siguruar kryesisht nga gjykata, minimalisht e duhur, nuk ka qene efektive dhe mendoj, as professionale. Mbrojtesi i caktuar nga gjykata, duke mos pasur autorizim nga mua, nuk ka bere ankim kunder vendimit te gjykates se faktit per te parashtruar pretendimet ankimore ne Gjykaten e Apelit. E ketij niveli ka qene edhe lidhur me ushtrimin e rekursit kunder dy vendimeve te gjykatave te rigjykimit ne Gjykaten e Larte.
Gjykata Kushtetuese mendoj se ne kete rast duhet ta konsideronte, se avokati, i emeruar kryesisht ose i zgjedhur nga personi, kur nuk me ka siguruar asistencen minimale te duhur, sidomos efektive por edhe professionale, i eshte shmangur detyrimit te tij. Kjo nuk ishte ne interes te drejtesise dhe per kete shkak nje gjykim i tille nuk eshte i drejte.
Bazuar ne:
Konventin per mbrojtjen e te Drejtave te Njeriut dhe Lirive Themelore,
Titulli i pare – Te drejtat dhe lirite,
Neni 3 – Ndalimi i tortures,
Neni 5 – E drejta per liri dhe siguri,
Pika 4 dhe 5.
Neni 6 – E drejta per nje proçes te rregullt,
Neni 13 – E drejta per ankim efektiv.
Gjykata e Larte nuk ka verifikuar detyrat qe i ka lene per zbatim gjate proçesit te rigjykimit te çeshtjes.
Pra kur Gjykata e Larte nuk kerkon zbatimin e detyrave qe i ka lene Gjykatave ne Vartesi te saj per kete çeshtje, s’ka se si te marri parasysh pretendimet e mia, sepse une i kam shprehur me pare, si ne seancat gjyqsore ashtu dhe ne ankimet e bera.
– Kerkoj nga Gjykata Europiane te te Drejtave te Njeriut si me poshte:
– Te vendosi konform objektit te kesaj kerkese.
– Por njekohesisht dua te shpreh dhe shqetesimin tim se, une nuk jam i sigurte per jeten ne vazhdimesi te personit tim, si dhe per familjen time, e cila po vuan si nga ana ekonomike, ashtu edhe nga pasiguria per jeten ne te ardhmen.
LISTA E DOKUMENTAVE QE I BASHKANGJITEN KESAJ KERKESE
A-
1) Gazeta –ALBANIA . Faqe SPECIALE nr. 7 (e premte 11-12-1998);
2) Gazeta – ALBANIA . Faqe SPECIALE nr. 7 (e shtune 12-12-1998);
3) Gazeta ALBANIA . Faqe SPECIALE nr. 7 ( e marte 15-12-1998);
4) Gazeta ALBANIA . Faqe SPECIALE nr. 10 (e enjte 17-12-1998);
5) Gazeta ALBANIA . Faqe SPECIALE nr. 6 (e shtune 19-12-1998);
6) Gazeta Rilindja Demokratike (R.D.) Faqe nr. 5 –AKTUALITET (e marte 23-03-1999);
7) Gazeta -KOHA JONE- Faqe nr. 2 (e hene 21-01-2002);
8) Gazeta -KOHA JONE- Faqe SPECIALE, nr. 12 (e merkure 23-01-2002);
9) Kerkes Padi e Dashnor Kozaj dt: 14-05-1994 Fier;
10) Vendim i Gjykates Apelit, Tirane nr. 5130 dt: 23-12-1994;
11) Rekurs drejtuar Gjykates se Larte, Tirane dt: 06-11-1998 ;
12) Vendim i Gjykates se Larte nr. 1047 dt : 07-10-1999 me nr. 662 te Regjistrit Themeltar;
13) Proçes-Verbal i mbajtur midis oficerit te Policis Gjyqsore, prane Gjykates se Shkalles Pare, te rrethit Korçe, Henrik Ligori dhe Dashnor Kozaj me dt : 25-10-1999, mbi njohjen e te pandehurit Dashnor me aktet e hetimeve paraprake ;
14) Epikrize e Spitalit Korçe, per shtrimin e Dashnor Kozaj nga torturat e policise ne dt : 17-02-2000 e vertetuar kjo nga vertetimi i Drejtoris Spitalore Korçe dt : 13-03-2001;
15) Vendim i Gjykates Shkalles Pare, Korçe nr. 185 dt: 14-07-2000 ;
16) Vendim i Gjykates Larte, Tirane nr. 510 dt: 26-12-2000;
17) Flete-Lirimi e Komisariatit Policis, Korçe me dt: 28-12-2000 per lirimin e Dashnor Kozaj nga birucat e Komisariatit Korçe;
18) Vendim i Gjykates Apelit, Korçe nr. 102 dt: 15-06-2001;
19) Vendim i Gjykates Larte, Tirane nr. 187 dt: 07-03-2002;
20) Vendim i Gjykates Rrethit, Korçe nr. 338 dt: 16-11-2004;
21) Vendim i Gjykates Apelit, Korçe nr. 109 dt: 11-10- 2005;
22) Vendim i Gjykates Larte, Tirane nr. 561 dt: 11-07-2007;
23) Vendim i Gjykates Kushtetuese, Tirane nr. 85 dt: 13-06-2008.
B-
Prova shkresore (te cilat nuk jane pranuar nga gjykatat):
I. Kontrate shitje Bitum, 1500 ton midis Albpetrolit dhe ‘‘V.E.F.A.’’ Holding, Tirane;
II. Kontrate shitje Solar, 500 ton midis Albpetrolit dhe ‘‘V.E.F.A.’’ Holding, Tirane;
III. Vendim nr. 18 dt: 07-04-1997 me nr. 66 Protokolli i Drejtorit te Pergjithshem ne Albpetrol;
IV. Informacion ‘‘mbi analizen e materialit shkresor te deges se Karburantit Korçe’’
dt: 23-09- 1997;
V. Informacion korrik 1997 mbi verifikim letre te punonjesve te karburantit ne Bilisht;
VI. Informacion te dt: 15-08-1997 mbi verifikimin e letrave dhe telegrameve te punonjesve te Albpetrolit, bashkangjitur letra ankes e Arjan Veraj e dt: 11-08-1997;
VII. Proçes-Verbali per terheqjen e ekstrakteve te dokumentave te Deges se Bankes, Korçe per muajt Maj-Qershor 1997, dt: 13-08-1997;
VIII. Proçes-Verbali i dt: 13-08-1997 i cili pasqyron gjashte fletengarkesa me karburant qe nuk jane bere hyrje dhe as nuk jane regjistruar ne kontabilitet, ne magazinat e Deges se Shperndarjes te Karburantit ne Korçe;
IX. Kontrate shitje e lidhur midis Kombinatit te Perpunimit te Thelle te Naftes, Ballsh, me perfaqesues Feçorr Hoxha dhe firmes private ‘‘Cota’’ Librazhd;
X. Raport ‘‘Mbi veprimtarine e Kontroll-Revizionit te Albpetrolit per periudhen 1992 deri 1996 dhe Shkurt-Tetor 1997’’, bashke me konkluzionet, mbi aktin e Kontroll-Revizionit mbi furnizimin e Deges se Shperndarjes te Karburanteve ne Korçe, me karburant gjate muajve Maj-Qershor 1997 te dt: 18-10-1997 qe ka numrin rendor 9;
XI. Kerkes me shkrim e kerkuesit Feçorr Hoxha, drejtuar Gjykates per tu pyetur si deshmitar Feçorr Hoxha te dt: 16-05-2003 me nr. 31 prot. te Gjykates Rrethit, Korçe;
XII. Kerkes e Dashnor Kozaj, drejtuar Gjykates Rrethit, Korçe dt: 25-03-2004, per shtytjen e proçesit te gjykimit;
XIII. Kerkes e Dashnor Kozaj, drejtuar Gjykates Rrethit, Korçe dt: 22-08-2004, per shtytjen e proçesit te gjykimit;
XIV. Raport i Komisionit Mjeko-Ligjor te Ancones, Itali per cilesimin e femijes Linda Dashnor Kozaj si minore invalid civil, ne dt: 06-03-2004, ne pritje per te bere trampiantin e palces;
XV. Raport i Komisionit Mjeko-Ligjor te Ancones, Itali per cilesimin e femijes Linda Dashnor Kozaj si minore invalid civil, ne dt: 14-02-2008.
Kerkues:
Dashnor Kozaj 08.10.2008
—————————————————————————————–
TO THE EUROPIAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Request:
Presented and based in the European Convent of Human Rights and based in the articles:
Article 3 – Torture ban;
Article 5 – The right for freedom and security Point 4 and 5;
Article 6 – The right for a regular proceeding
Article 13- The right for an effective complaint
Article 41- The right compensation
Demander: Dashnor Luto Kozaj born in Fier, on 02.09.1956, resident in the Street “Zoja Curre”, Building 53/3, Tirana. Phone No. ………………….
Object:
A. Invalidation of the decisions :
No. 338, dated 16.11.2004 of the Court of the Judicial District, Korca ;
No.109, dated 11.10.2005 of the Court of Appeal Korca;
No. 561, dated 11.07.2007 of Consulting Chamber of the Penal College of the High Court, Tirana;
No.85, dated 13.06.2008 of the College of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Albania
B. Right compensation :
• For the period I have been unemployed (12.12.1997 – 29.07.1999)
• For the time I have been arrested in opposition to the law (29.07.1999 – 29.12.2000)
• For the time I have been under house arrest (29.12.2000 – 11.10.2005)
• Compensation for the moral detriment inflicted to me
Based on the Article 41 of the European Convent of Human Rights.
Honorable Judges:
– I have been graduated at the Tirana University in the Branch of Industry Economist.
– I have worked as an economist by the Auditing Directory in Albpetrol, Patos, firstly as a member of this Directory and later as the Director of the Auditing Directory in Albpetrol until 12.12.1997.
– During all this period I have worked there I have been characterized by the irreconcilability to everyone that violated the law.
– I have many facts and I am mentioning some of them as follows :
– During the period 1992 until 12.12.1997 I have been faced with phenomenons and flagrant violations of law as the following cases related to :
1. The arrival of aids and grants from European Committee for the period 1992 – 1993 consisting of material base and different chemicals, etc.
a) The law violations regarding the arrival of these aids consist in the some times raising of the prices compared to market price.
b) another violation was that the value of these commodities bought with extraordinary prices was
cashed for the Ministry of Energy in the form of the counter party fund.
2. During the period 1992 – 1994 I have ascertained flagrant violations of the Resolution of U.N.O in
relation to the violation of the embargo against Serbia as regards to the fuels.
– These phenomenons I have checked in Customs Centers of the Republic of Albania verifying them by myself, when Ridvan Bode has been the Customs General Director and today he is Minister of Finance of Albania.
– As the result of the denunciation of these phenomenons I was fired of my work on September 1993.
– For this question I opened a judicial conflict by means of a Request – Accusation dated 14.05.1994 having as its object: return to the work.
(Read the Request – Accusation dated 14.05.1994)
– After the conclusion of the judicial processes I was return back to work with the Decision No.5130 dated 23.12.1994 of the Appeal Court of Tirana.
(Read the above-mentioned Decision)
– In 1997 (June) in Albania the political rotation was made. In the leadership of the State came the
representatives of the Socialist Party, when as the Minister of the Ministry of Energy was appointed Ylli Bufi, who before March 1992 has been Prime Minister of Albania and he had signed for the delivery of European Community aids with prices many times higher than the market prices of that time.
– Being consequent in relation to everybody that violated the law, I ascertained that the General
Director of Albpetrol Mr. Gjergji Kerri, a closed friend of the Minister of Energy Mr. Ylli Bufi , started to steal. In fact I ascertained that the General Director of Albpetrol Mr. Gjergji Kerri on 12.09.1997 signed two false contracts as if they have sold to “Vefa” Holding Tirana with its Manager Vehbi Alimuçaj as follows:
– 1. Heavy oil 500 tons x 97 $ / ton = 48 500 $
2. Bitumen 1500 tons x 100 $ / ton = 150 000 $
– These contracts were falsified and this fact is certified by my confrontation with the Manager of “Vefa” Holding Mr. Vehbi Alimuçaj, who did not accept these contracts to have been signed by him and he had nobody authorized for this kind of business (Read the contracts with the notes of Mr. Vehbi Alimuçaj.)
– This is the way or the form used by the corrupted men in power who seized the leading of Albanian State by the middle of 1977 to grab and destroy all the properties of the Company “Vefa” Holding.
– After these violations being ascertained, I had informed the Minister of Energy Mr. Ylli Bufi and the Deputy Prime Minister of that time Mr. Kastriot Islami.
– Their response for the violations carried out by their friend Mr. Gjergji Kerri in the position of the General Director of Albpetrol was firing me of the work.
– I objected my firing of the work opening a judicial process.
– During the judicial processes I argued with concrete facts the violations of the law or the thefts
which were ascertained in Albpetrol, Albania in the period of time 1992 until the end of 1997.
– These violations of the law I made in evidence and argued with concrete facts also in my Request
I have made by the Supreme Court Tirana on 06.11.1998 with No.662 of the registered act in the Fundamental Register of the Supreme Court Tirana.
– I have denounced Mr. Gjergji Kerri , General Director of Albpetrol, as a thief of the property of Albpetrol and I have accused as his supporters the Minister of Energy Mr. Ylli Bufi and Deputy Prime Minister of that time Mr. Kastriot Islami as the defender and the supporter of the thief Gjergji Kerri, who was in a very important duty as the Director of Albpetrol.
(Read the Recourse introduced to the High Court).
– By the end of 1998until May 1999 I made clear to the public in the daily press in Albania all the violations of the law I had ascertained in Albpetrol.
(Read the newspapers)
– During this period the judicial process was not carrying out in the High Court.
– I had asked the following persons to be presented in the trial:
o Ylli Bufi as Minister of Energy
o Kastriot Islami as Deputy Prime Minister
in order they could argue or declare that they were also aware about the written materials and legal facts, in order I could win the right to return to my work position as the Director of Auditing Directory in Albpetrol.
– I was arrested in opposition to every law or fact on 29.07.1999 in my house in Patos, Fieri District,
without the trial in the High Court being held, under the accusation I had collaborated with the thieves of the property of Albpetrol in the town of Korça, 250 km far of my working place. The trial for my return to work was carried out on 07.10.1999 it means after 3 months I was in the pre-imprisonment cells of Korça Commissariat. The Administrative College with its Decision No.1047 dated 07.10.1999 and Act No. 662 in the Supreme Court took the decision I had not to return in my previous work.
– It was me the person who had verified, ascertained and denounced the thefts in the Oil
Distribution Branch in Korça, firing the culpable persons from the work and proposing the penal investigation for them.
– From the moment of the ascertainment up to the firing from the work of the thieves in the Oil
Distribution Branch in Korça was not passed even 24 hours.
– It was me the first denunciator of these thefts. In Korça I have gone in the company of other
– colleges to make the auditing based on the complaints done by the employees of Oil
– Distribution Branch in Bilishti, who were in administrative dependency of Oil Distribution
Branch of Korça. These complaints are accompanied by the orders of General Directors of
Albpetrol at that time Afrim Jupi and Gjergji Kerri, who have given me in written the duty for the
Director of the Auditing Directory to go and verify on the spot the problems laid down by the workers of Bilishti.
(Read the complaints and orders in written).
– Without dwelling at length in this I stress that Albanian state, the corrupted men in power, the
corrupted prosecutors and all the judges who have participated in the judgment of this case on purpose have collaborated these thefts and the gigantic corruption carried out in Albpetrol could not be revealed.
– Qualifying me as a collaborator with the thieves , Albanian Courts (the judges who have
participated in my case) in collaboration with the persons covered with state and political power
made it possible the thefts I had denounced at the Supreme Court with Register No.662 year 1999 to be closed or covered.
– Further I am explaining how the processes are carried out in full opposition with the law and the European Convents of Human Rights.
– It s’ worth to be stressed that the great responsibility falls on the Supreme Court , Tirana, because in
the Decision No.187 dated 07.03.2002 it has appointed many duties for the Judicial District of Korça, which under the process of re-judgment did not applied them and the Supreme Court shut–up in the conclusion of the judgment of this case.
– During the process of re-judgment my daughter was sick and diagnosed with Talasso-Drepanocitosa
(Mediterranean anemia). Since 6 years I am curing her in Italy and I am waiting for a marrow transplant.
– The medico-legal Commission in Italy has qualified my child as a civil invalid waiting for a marrow transplant.
(Read the medical reports).
– So, the Decision of the Supreme Court No.561 dated 11.07.2007 is an illegal one because the duties given by this Court itself for the Subordinate Court were not verified.
Honorable Judges:
As a subject of a judicial process, due to the unjust judgment, I am legitimated in my request for the invalidation of the Decisions of the Courts given against me as being in opposition to the European Convent on the Human Rights as follows:
I. Decision of the District Court of Korça No.185 dated 14.07.2000
II. Decision of the Appeal Court of Korça No.102 dated 15.06.2001
III. Decision of the Supreme Court of Tirana No.187 dated 07.03.2002
IV. Decision of the District Court of Korça No.338 dated 16.11.2004
V. Decision of the Appeal Court of Korça No.109 dated 11.10. 2005
VI. Decision of the Supreme Court Tirana No.561 dated 11.07.2007.
VII. Decision of the Constitutional Court, Tirana No.85 dated 13.06.2008.
As this case is in the competences of the European Court of Human Rights I am introducing to you as following:
1. PROCESS OF PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
– On 01.07.1999 the Court of Korça had decided as security measure for Dashnor Kozaj the arrest in prison for the penal act of property stealing misusing the duty.
In appliance of this decision I was arrested in Fieri on 29.07.1999 and sent to the isolation rooms of the Police of Korça on 30.07.1999 where I am investigated being under arrest.
The Judicial Police after the completion of the investigations on 25.10.1999 has made me known with corresponding acts of the investigation dossier.
As revealed by the minutes of the case I have asked the copy of compiled acts during the preliminary investigation to be put under my disposal and I have claimed that my activity I had carried out in conformity to the laws, declaring that for this I had in my disposal the necessary documents, which gave evidence on the fact that it was me that revealed and denounced the thefts in Albpetrol and their authors including also the General Director of Albpetrol and other high state authorities.
The requests and my above-mentioned claims, necessary to prove my innocence and the request to present to them the copies of the documents supporting the investigation acts were not accepted for clarification by the accusing part.
The prosecutor in charge of following the investigation and the officer of the Judicial Police in opposition to the Article 327.1 of the Penal Procedure Code have not prepared the explanatory relation, compulsory, for the facts and the proofs with their suggestions for the way of the conclusion of the investigations and to present it to the District Prosecutor for examination.
The Prosecutor (entitled Head) of the Prosecutor’s Office, in absence of the relation, has decided the submission of the case to the Court. After this the request for the judgment of the case was compiled and the dossier was submitted to the competent Court. In opposition to the Article No.331.1 of the penal Procedure Code it was signed by the Dependent of the entitled Head, the prosecutor Edmond Shytko, in charge for the investigation and not by the Prosecutor of the Judicial District, Vangjel Tanellari as the entitled Head of the Prosecutor’s Office. The request for the judgment of the case also in opposition to the Article 331.3 of the Penal Procedure Code is not made known to the demander Dashnor Kozaj, against his signature.
These violations, the absence of the signature of the District Prosecutor in the request for judgment and the absence of information of Dashnor Kozaj, against his signature as a defendant, make that unavailable as a procedural act, together with the juridical consequences deriving from it. So the judgments and the decisions of the courts having examined this case are unavailable. In this context the court has judged and has decided for a penal case without having a request by the Prosecutor’s Office.
To all is known that the Prosecutor’s Office of whatever level in the relations with the third parts is represented by the entitled Head and not by his Dependents, who in these cases are not legitimated to sign the request for the judgment of the case and to submit it to the court.
The exclusive right and the competence of the prosecutor to sign the request for judgment and not of his dependent, is a principal and legal question, otherwise the court is not legitimated to judge a penal case without the request of the entitled Head of the Prosecutor’s Office.
The Police during the time I have been held in the isolation rooms has beaten and maltreated me. They have not provided me a human treatment, but I have been subjected to the tortures and to the humiliation. Due to these reasons on 17.02.2000 I have been hospitalized in the Hospital of Korça under the diagnosis “Contusio Corporis” as the result of the hits with strong things and means on the head, face and body, taking the necessary treatment. This fact is reflected in the written certificate dated 13.03.2001 issued by the Hospital of Korça. Unfortunately the medical personnel in opposition to the Article 282 of Penal Procedure Code, although it is its obligation, have not denounced this case to the Judicial Police.
I have denounced in the prosecutor’s Office, I have protested for this maltreatment before the court as well, but I have been faced to the wall of the silence. Based on the Article5.2 of the Penal Procedure Code, Article 25 of the Constitution and Article No.3 of the European Convent, these violations are the hardest and the most condemnable ones, because they limit and harm the human freedom and rights.
(Read the medical epycrisis and the certificate of the Hospital of Korça).
2. PROCESS OF INVASTIGATION OF THE CASE
As the request for the judgment of the case was not signed by the Prosecutor but by his dependent, the court could not and should not to be invested in the judgment of the case, more over when the request was not signed from the demander Dashnor Kozaj as well and he has not been informed about that. Under these circumstances and due to this reason the dossier from the administrative point of view had to be turned back by the court and the case had not to be judged by it.
With the Decision 185 dated 14.07.2000 the Court has declared the demander Dashnor Kozaj culpable and condemned me for theft of the property in collaboration and misuse of the duty, based on the Article 135 and 25 of the Penal Procedure Code.
The demander Dashnor Kozaj has presented a petitionary request against this decision propounding as follows:
• The decision is made denying the right of defense in a penal process;
• The right of speech has been denied in course of the judgment;
• The right of the defending part to present written proofs and free proofs by means of the witnesses and the court has not answered to these pretensions through its decision.
With the Decision 201 dated 15.06.2001 the Appeal Court has made the decision to keep in power the decision of the Court of the First Step. But in its decision the Appeal Court has not analyzed and has not answered to my foregoing pretentions, propounded against the Decision of the District Court.
The demander Dashnor Kozaj has presented recourse against the decisions of both courts, propounding as follows:
• The court has not permitted me to speak and explain the circumstances of the events in no sitting.
• The court has violated the Articles No. 356, 357, 358 and 359 of the Penal Procedure Code, that means that I have been deprived from my right to propound the facts, object of this accusation, and to present the proofs ,whose examination I was looking for.
• The court has not made a decision for receiving the proofs and it has not permitted the presentation of the pretensions and after that to receive them.
• The court has not made me known that it is my right to make pretensions in relations to the receiving the proofs during the judicial examination.
With the Decision No. 187 dated 07.03.2002 the Supreme Court has decided the cancel of the decisions of both courts and it has submitted the case for re-propounding to the Court of First Step of Korça. As the cause for the cancel of the decisions it has accepted that:
• The court without any arguments and proof analysis have accepted that the demander Dashnor Kozaj together with other persons S. Starova, S. Shano and L. Duka has stolen through the duty misusing the value of 8.238.840 leke.
• The conclusions of the courts are contradictory and not based in proofs, making them unreasonable.
• The participation in the crime, the role of the collaborators and the stolen value as well are not proved.
• The Appeal Court has accepted the logic made by the Court of Facts in its decision, but it has not answered to my pretensions that it was me the person who had made the denunciation of other defendants.
• The court has not subdued the proofs to the discussion of the parties.
3. PROCESS OF THE RE-JUDGMENT OF THE CASE
With the Decision No.338 dated 16.11.2004 the Court of Re-judgment has decided again the condemnation of Dashnor Kozaj. For this decision it was based on the same arguments of the Court of Facts and it had not taken into account the pretensions of the demander Dashnor Kozaj and in opposition to the Article 440 in relation to the article 447.2 of the Penal procedure Code it has not applied the duties and the conclusions put forward by the Supreme Court. The Court of Facts in course of the re-propounding the case has not followed the decision of this court as regards to the clarification of the question where did the agreement in crime stand and what has been the role of every collaborator, and it has not accepted the request of the demander Dashnor Kozaj to administrate his proofs and subdue them to a judicial debate. These proofs certified his innocence and in the sitting of 02.05.2003 he has presented the repeated request to hand over a copy of all his documents.
These violations, the unilateral investigation, non-appliance of the duties, avoiding the Decision of the Supreme Court at the re-judgment, refusal of the proofs presented by the demander Dashnor Kozaj are hard and make the process unjust and with negative consequences for me.
During the re-judgment I have asked again to present the proofs on my favor, either by the witnesses or by documents, but no results. More over the court has not allowed me to ask the witnesses and the defendants and to do the confrontation of my and their declarations as well. As it reveals from the judicial minutes the court has forbidden the defendants and the witnesses to answer to the questions of the demander Dashnor Kozaj.
I have requested Feçorr Hoxha and Afrim Jupi to be asked in the quality of the witness; they have been persons in leading duties in Albpetrol. They were aware about the auditing carried out by me at the Oil Selling Branch of Korça, they knew I had revealed the responsibility of the culpable persons and made the corresponding proposals regarding the administrative, civil and penal measures, which have to be taken for the violations carried out by other defendants. But the court has not asked these witnesses. Through this I wanted to prove that I was not involved in the crime.
A typical one is the case with Feçorr Hoxha, who has required in written to the court on 16.05.2003 to be asked. He was presented to the court on 16.05.2003 and he has asked to testify about the case, as ex-chief of the Oil Selling Branch at Oil Deep Elaborating Works in Ballsh. The court has not accepted to call and ask him in the quality of the witness. But he on 16.05.2003 has handed over to the secretary his testimony in written, which he would make before the court. According to the written declarations, Dashnor Kozaj has made the auditing and ascertainments of the violations at the oil Selling Branch in Korça in his presence. In this declaration he admits that all phrases written in it are true, while the accusations against Dashnor Kozaj were baseless.
This request is disappeared from the judicial dossier of the judgment and is not administrated by the judicial corps. (Read the Certification of the Judicial District Court Korça dated 14.11.2008).
Also I went on with my request to present before the court written proofs, like:
-information of 15.08.1997, compiled together the auditor Genc Koliçi, in which were reflected the violations and abuses carried out by Sabaudin Starova and his dependants, including the drawing by the Saving Bank of Korça by means of a circulation order 17.06.1997 of the sum of 6.000.000 leke, used for the construction of the building he had bought in 1997 in the town of Pogradeci; in this circulation order the reason and where this money would be used were not specified;
-The report “On the activity of Auditing Directory of Albpetrol for the periods 1992 – 1996 and February 1997 – October 1997 dated 18.10.1997 and
-The information “On the analysis of the materials of Oil Branch of Korçe”, dated 23.09.1997, signed by the Director of Oil Selling Affiliate of Albpetrol of Fier, Bashkim Habilaj.
In these written documents, which I required to be administrated by the court, are reflected the violations made by other defendants ascertained by the auditing carried out by me and the measures for their indemnifying, cashing and the proposal for penal investigation against the responsible persons at the Oil Selling Directory of Korça.
The refusal of the request for asking the required witnesses, of the request for receiving of written documents and their administration in course of the judgment goes against the Articles 151 and 152 of the Penal Procedure Code and the Decision No.187 dated 07.03.2003 of the Supreme Court, which orientated the pretension of Dashnor Kozaj that “He has discovered and denounced the defendants Sabaudin Starova and Lirika Duka”. In this way the court has violated the right of Dashnor Kozaj to be defended by an accusation made just from those persons who have been denounced earlier by him. In the meaning of the Article 31.d of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to make questions and to require the presentation of the witnesses, who can clarify the facts, this consists a violation of a regular judicial process.
The Court of Re-judgment has held the last sittings without my presence. I have not been present due to the fact I have been obliged to stay by my minor daughter, being urgently hospitalized in a Hospital in Italy as she was ill by a disease very dangerous to the life. This disease could not be cured in Albania. In my letters of 25 March and 26 August 2004, together with hospital documents I have requested to the court the postponement of judicial sittings until a minor improvement of her health would be observed; after that I would start urgently to continue the judicial process. Although this has been a reasonable obstacle, which excluded me from the responsibility of contumacy at the judicial sitting, the court in opposition to the Article 350.1 of Penal Procedure Code , which obliged it to suspend the judicial examination of the case, has decided the declaration of my absence and the ongoing of the judgment appointing simply a defender, whose role and his defense have not been effective, but extremely formal and totally unprofessional, because he has stood fully inactive during the judgment. Prior to the conclusion of the judicial investigation he has not asked to the court the appliance of the duties put in the Decision of the Supreme Court and the repeated requests by the demander Dashnor Kozaj on the asking of his witnesses and on the presentation of written proofs to be accepted; in fact in the sitting of re-judgment on 02.05.2003 many times I have asked to the court to hand over a copy of all documents in disposal of the demander Dashnor Kozaj, while the final discussion he has started and finished with a single word” I ask innocence”, without formulating and propounding before the court the corresponding pretensions and conclusions. In this way the defender has not helped the procedural rights to be guaranteed to Dashnor Kozaj and his legal interests to be preserved, obligation deriving from Article 6.2 of the Penal Procedure Code.
The decision taken by the court of re-judgment in my absence and taking into consideration the fact I have not been informed for this decision in due time, I have not had the possibility to exercise my right for complaint. For this reason my constitutional right for complaint to a higher court , foreseen by Article 43 of the Constitution , is violated.
With the Decision No. 109 dated 11.05.2005 The Appeal Court has decided the change of the Decision of the Courts of Facts. The court has made the change of the juridical qualification of the act in charge of Dashnor Kozaj, from theft in collaboration misusing the duty, foreseen by Article 135 and 25 of the Penal Code, to collaboration based on Article 248 and 25 of the Penal Code.
According to the decision of the Appeal Court, the culpability due to misusing the duty does not stand in the fact Dashnor Kozaj has not aimed to steal, but in the fact he has not applied the auditing duties. On opposition to this conclusion of the court, the facts and the proofs have revealed the contrary, that it was precisely me through my audit the illegal actions of the other defendants were revealed and denounced.
The Appeal Court has made the change of the juridical qualification of the penal act after the judicial examination, at the time it was retreated to take the decision. This procedural act, mainly the change from the court of the juridical qualification of the act, has violated the regular legal process because it before could made this change, its duty was to make it known to the parties and for this reason absolutely it had to re-open the judicial sitting, in order to give to them the possibility to make their pretensions and to be prepared as regards to this change. Even the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court has accepted the right the court has to change the accusation, but on condition the parties to be informed and to hear their pretensions on advance; otherwise the judicial process is not a regular one. (see: Decisions of the Constitutional Court 1998 – 1999. Page 284).
Demander Dashnor Kozaj has presented recourse to the Supreme Court against both decisions. As the Appeal Court had not reasoned the decision in time, the lawyer compiling the recourse has not shown in details the causes, violations of the law, facts and proofs presented to contradict the decision but has treated the case superficially. Although in the recourse he has expressed these questions he would propound after the reasoned decision of the Appeal Court being taken; in fact he has not prepared the recourse.
In this case the responsibility falls on the lawyer and not on me, because the defense, the same as in the re-judgment of the first step, has been a formal one, not effective and not professional. In the meaning of the Article 31 of the Constitution the defense of legal and constitutional interests of Dashnor Kozaj is violated.
The defendant Sotiraq Shamo in his complaint made to the Supreme Court Tirana on the invalidation of the decisions No. 185 dated 14.07.2000 of the Court of Facts, Korça and No.102 dated 15.06.2001 of the Appeal Court Korça has declared as follows:
• I have been threatened to be eliminated physically and my children to be grabbed, in order I could not tell the truth on the events happened in the Oil Distribution Branch of Korça in course of the year 1997.
• Sotiraq Shamo has been constrained to make a false complaint against Dashamir Kozaj.
(Read the complaint, the recourse of Sotiraq Shamo on 25.06.2001 for the Supreme Court Tirana).
Me, the demander Dashnor Kozaj in many sittings of the re-judgment of the case I have required the defendant Sotiraq Shamo to be asked, the confrontation with me to be made in the judicial sittings, but the Court of Re-judgment never accepted that, taking the decision my request could not be accepted, considering it as an illegal one.
I based my request on the Penal Procedure Code, Article 167 / 1.
(Read the minutes of the re-judgment, page 36 date 20.03.2003).
• Another scandal in the decision No.109 dated 11.10.2005 of the Appeal Court , Korça is the fact that the defendant Sotiraq Shamo is condemned by this court with the time of pre-imprisonment; in fact this man has not been even a single hour as arrested in pre-imprisonment.
• Also this scandalous fact of the Appeal Court , Korça, neither the Supreme Court nor the Constitutional Court of Albania have not evidenced, in order to cancel the decisions of the dependent courts in Korça, as not based to the law or to the irrevocable proofs.
The Advisory Chamber of the Penal College of the Supreme Court with its decision No.561 dated 11.07.2007 has decided the non-admission of the recourse, although as they were treated, the juridical problems were numerous, of that character and nature forming violations leading undoubtedly to the cancelling the decision.
4. PRESENTATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL CAUSES
The guarantees foreseen by the procedural legislation, The Constitution and the European Convent are not followed neither during the judicial process nor during the preceding phase of the preliminary investigation.
1. The right to be informed with the request for the judgment of the case and its content, Article 331 of the Penal Procedure Code is violated.
The existing request for the judgment of the case, accompanying the investigation dossier, has not propounded in details the sources of the proofs and the facts they are referred to and as we have propounded above, it was not signed and sealed by the Prosecutor and me Dashnor Kozaj; also I am not informed about that against my sign. Consequently the dossier had to return back administratively by the court as under these conditions it could not be invested for its examination. For this reason the executed judgments are invalid because the legal request for the judgment of the case is absent.
2. The right to present written proofs and with witnesses and to be administrated by the court Article 31.d of the Constitution and 6.1 and 3.d of the Convent, is violated.
The Court had as his duty to consider in the same way the proofs, by means of which Dashnor Kozaj was accused and had to take and analyze the proofs presented by me, with which I required the certification of my innocence as regards to the accusation made against me.
This constitutional right is not applied in favor of the demander Dashnor Kozaj. Just for this reason the Supreme Court has invalidated for the first time the both decisions of the lower courts reasoning that during the re-examination of the case the existence of the agreement and the certification of the subjective side of every person in the execution of the act should be clarified. Rightly it has made remarks to the lower courts that they have not followed the procedural requests (Article 151, 152) related to the receiving and the evaluation of the proofs and have not answered to the problems and pretensions of the case presented by Dashnor Kozaj in course of the judgment and it has be me the official person who discovered the thefts and made their denunciation.
In the re-judgment of the case the courts have made the same procedural violations. It was denied to me the right of presentation of free written proofs and with witnesses, which gave evidence on my innocence; this thing I have propounded with insistence before every court. This violation makes invalid the judicial process.
3. The principle of the equality of the means Article 6.3 of the European Convent is violated
The right for a regular judgment includes also the principle of the equality of the means. In the case of Dashnor Kozaj this principle is violated, because it is not provided to me for the presentation of my case the equal possibility compared to the accusing part. During the judgment the accusing part has had advantages as regards to me, the demander Dashnor Kozaj, because to me it was denied the possibility to present my proofs with witnesses like Feçor Hoxha and Afrim Jupi and the written proofs as well, like the information dated 15.08.1997; 02.09.1997; Auditing Act dated 18.10.1997 and the minutes dated 13.08.1997 and other documents attached to this request, which invalidate the accusations and prove my innocence.
4. The right to be informed for the new accusation Article 6.3.a of the Convent is violated
The Appeal Court has re-qualified the penal act after the judicial examination was closed and it is retreated to take the decision. The re-qualification of a penal act after the judicial sitting being closed, when the court mainly makes this, must be made known earlier to the parts, in order to give them possibility to propound their pretensions and the person to organize the defense for the new accusation.
Although the material facts propounded by the Prosecutor’s Office against Dashnor Kozaj were known, it was the duty of the court to inform the parties, especially me, in order to give me the possibility to express my pretensions and to present the numerous proofs as well, administrated by me also today I am doing this request. Also for this reason the judicial process is an unjust one.
5. The right to be present in the judicial process of the re-judgment and to be heard Article 31.3 of the Constitution, Article 6.1 and 6.3 of the Convent is violated
The court of re-judgment has held the last judicial sittings without my presence. I had not given up from the right to be present in the hearing sittings. My absence in the judgment has derived due to reasonable causes which exclude me from the responsibility for my absence in the judgment. For my impossibility to participate in the judicial sittings I have made known in written to the court and I have required their postponement. Independently from this, the court instead of suspending the judicial examination, has declared my absence. It has carried out the trial without my presence, denying unjustly to me the right to hear and to be defended.
6. The right for an effective and professional legal help, minimally necessary Article 31.ç of the Constitutional and 6(3) c of the Convent is violated
I, being not informed for the execution of the judicial sittings and the decision of my condemnation, could not exert my right for complaint against the decision of the court of re-judgment.
The defense provided mainly by the court, minimally necessary, has not been neither an effective one and I think nor a professional one. The defender appointed by the court, having no authorization from me, has not made a complaint against the decision of the Court of Facts in order to propound complaining pretensions to the Appeal Court.
I think that in this case the Constitutional Court had to consider the fact that the lawyer, mainly appointed or selected by the person, when he has not provided the minimal assistance to me, especially effective and professional, he has deviated from his obligation. This is not in the interest of the justice and for this reason such a judgment is unjust.
Based on
– The Convent for the defense of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
First chapter – The rights and the freedoms
Article 3 – Ban of torture
Article 5 – The right for freedom and security
Paragraph 4 and 5
Article 6 – The right for a regular process.
Article 13- The right for an effective complaint
– The Supreme Court has not verified the duties it has given to be applied in course of the re-judgment process of the case.
– So, if the Supreme Court does not require the appliance of the duties given to the Dependent Courts for this case, it can not take into consideration my pretension, because I have them expressed earlier, either in the judicial sittings or in other complaints.
– I demand from European Court of Human Rights as follows :
– To make its decision in conformity with the object of this request
– In the same time I have to express my concern because in continuity I do not feel safe for my life and for my family as well, which is suffering either from the economic point of view or the incertainty for its life in the future.
LIST OF DOCUMENTS ATTACHED TO THIS REQUEST
– A –
1) Newspaper ALBANIA – SPECIAL page No.7 (Friday 11.12.1998)
2) Newspaper ALBANIA – SPECIAL page No.7 (Saturday 11.12.1998)
3) Newspaper ALBANIA – SPECIAL page No.7 (Tuesday 15.12.1998)
4) Newspaper ALBANIA – SPECIAL page No.10 (Thursday 17.12.1998)
5) Newspaper ALBANIA – SPECIAL page No.6 (Saturday 19.12.1998)
6) Newspaper Rilindja Demokratike (R.D.) page No.5 –ACTUALITIES (Tuesday 23.03.1999)
7) Newspaper KOHA JONE – page No.2 (Monday 21.01.2002)
8) Newspaper KOHA JONE – SPECIAL page No.12 (Wednesday 23.01.2002)
9) Request accusation of Dashnor Kozaj dated 14.05.1994 Fier
10) Decision of the Appeal Court, Tirana No. 5130 dated 23.12.1994
11) Recourse introduced to the Supreme Court, Tirana dated 06.11.1998
12) Decision of the Supreme Court No.1047 dated 07.10.1999 with No. 662 of the Fundamental Register.
13) Minutes held between the officer of the Judicial Police, by the Court of First Step, District Korça, Henrik Ligori and Dashnor Kozaj on 25.10.1999 on the recognition of the acts of preliminary investigation by the defendant Dashnor.
14) Epicrisis of the Hospital Korça on the hospitalization of Dashnor Kozaj due to the tortures of the Police on 17.02.2000, certified by the certificate of Hospitalizing Directory Korça on 13.03.2001.
15) Decision of the Court of the First Step, Korça No. 185 dated 14.07.2000
16) Decision of the Supreme Court, Tirana No.510 dated 26.12.2000
17) Release paper of the Police Commissariat, Korça on 28.12.2000 on the release of Dashnor Kozaj from the cells of the Commissariat, Korça.
18) Decision of the Appeal Court, Korça No. 102 dated 15.06.2001
19) Decision of the Supreme Court, Tirana No. 187 dated 07.03.2002
20) Decision of the District Court, Korça No. 338 dated 16.11.2004
21) Decision of the Appeal Court, Korça No. 109 dated 11.10.2005
22) Decision of the Supreme Court, Tirana No. 561 dated 11.07.2007
23) Decision of the Constitutional Court, Tirana No. 85 dated 13.06.2008
Written documents and proofs (not accepted by the courts)
I. Selling contract of bitumen, 1500 tons between Albpetrol and “VEFA” Holding, Tirana
II. Selling contract of heavy oil 500 tons between Albpetrol and “VEFA” Holding, Tirana
III. Decision No.18 dated 07.04.1997 with Prot. No. 66 of the General Director of Albpetrol
IV. Information “On the analysis of the written materials of Oil Branch Korça” dated 23.09.1997
V. Information July 1997 on the verification of the letter of the employees of Oil Branch in Bilisht;
VI. Information dated 15.08.1997 on the verification of the letters and telegrams of the employees of Albpetrol, attached the letter of complaint of Arjan Veraj dated 13.08.1997
VII. Minutes on the retreat of extracts of documents of the Bank Branch, Korça for the months May – June 1997, dated 13.08.1997;
VIII. Minutes of 13.08.1997, which reflects six paper of charges with oil not registered in the entries book of the stores of Oil Distributing Branch in Korça and not registered in account books as well;
IX. Selling contract bound between Oil Deep Elaboration Works, Ballsh with its representative Feçorr Hoxha and the private firm “Cota” Librazhd;
X. Report “On the activity of the Auditing Directory in Albpetrol for the period 1992 until 1996 and February-October 1997”, together with the conclusions of the Auditing Act on the oil supply of the Oil Distributing Branch in Korça during the months May – June 1997 dated 18.10.1997 with its ordering number 9;
XI. Written request of the demander Feçorr Hoxha, introduced to the Court to be asked as a witness Feçorr Hoxha dated 16.05.2003 with Prot. No. 31 of the District Court, Korça;
XII. Request of Dashnor Kozaj, introduced to the District Court, Korça dated 25.03.2004 for the postponement of the judgment process;
XIII. Request of Dashnor Kozaj, introduced to the District Court, Korça dated 22.08.2004 for the postponement of the judgment process;
XIV. Report of the Medico – Legal Commission of Ancona, Italy for the qualification of the child Linda Dashnor Kozaj as a minor civil invalid dated 06.03.2004, waiting for a marrow transplant;
XV. Report of the Medico – Legal Commission of Ancona, Italy for the qualification of the child Linda Dashnor Kozaj as a minor civil invalid dated 14.02.2008.
Demander
Dashnor Kozaj 08.10.2008
V:O
Redaksia e Alba – Dansk keto dokumente i jane vene ne dizpozicion nga vete z. Kozaj.
Leave a Reply